Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has granted a higher disability rating for anxiety neurosis, but the case is remanded to provide a statement of the case on the issue.

The deciding factor: The veteran's claim for service connection was denied due to lack of exposure to herbicides in service. The increased rating for anxiety neurosis was granted by the RO and now needs to be addressed through a Statement of the Case (SOC).

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
30%
Decision date
November 28, 2007
Citation
0737306

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0737306.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.