The veteran's hypertension was not incurred in service and is not related to his diabetes.,Bronchitis and restrictive defect were not incurred in service. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to service or exposure to herbicide agents.,A skin disorder, including tinea cruris, seborrheic dermatitis, folliculitis, and chronic uticaria, was not shown to be related to service.
The deciding factor: The earliest diagnosis of hypertension was in 1995, which is more than 24 years after the veteran's separation from service. The VA examiner opined that the veteran's hypertension was independent from his diabetes.,There is no evidence linking bronchitis and restrictive defect to service or exposure to herbicide agents. The earliest diagnosis of bronchitis was in 1991, which is more than 20 years after separation from service.,The earliest diagnoses of the skin disorders were in 1983, 1974, and 1991, all occurring before the veteran's separation from service. The VA examiner did not find a link between these conditions and service or exposure to herbicide agents.
- Claimed conditions
- Hypertension, Bronchitis and Restrictive Defect, Skin Disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 17, 2007
- Citation
- 0739591
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0739591.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for hypertension and has remanded the issue of an increased rating for skin condition.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has restored the Veteran's 10% rating for hypertension effective December 1, 2025 and denied a rating in excess of 10%. The reduction from 10% to noncompensable was not proper.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.