The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for service connection for a dental disorder of the mandible is not warranted as a matter of law due to lack of evidence supporting his claims and because he does not meet the legal criteria for service connection.
The deciding factor: The veteran did not have a compensable dental disability, and there was no evidence that his current condition resulted from in-service trauma or disease. The veteran's claim is denied as it falls outside the scope of what can be legally granted under VA regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- resorption of the maxillary ridge, resorption of the mandibular ridge
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2007
- Citation
- 0740522
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0740522.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a compensable dental disorder of the maxilla resulting from service trauma, and thus is not entitled to service connection for compensation or VA outpatient dental treatment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's dental claim is being remanded for further development due to insufficient evidence provided by the VA examiner regarding the extent of maxilla loss and its association with service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.