The veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for his service-connected PTSD is being remanded due to the need for additional treatment records and information from the VA Medical Center and Veteran's Outreach Center.
The deciding factor: Additional medical records are needed to properly assess the veteran's condition and determine if a higher rating is warranted.
- Claimed conditions
- post-traumatic disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 31, 2007
- Citation
- 0740951
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0740951.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection claims was dismissed due to the untimeliness of the VA Form 10182 filed in May 2021, which did not meet the one-year filing period after receiving notice of the April 2018 and September 2018 decisions.
- Granted
The Veteran's petition to reopen his previously denied claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is granted. The Board finds that new and material evidence has been received, specifically the Veteran's statements asserting a continuity of symptoms from military service. As such, the claim is reopened. However, the issue of entitlement to service connection remains remanded as further medical examination is needed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including obtaining records related to his PTSD and any disability retirement application from the post office. He should also be provided notice in compliance with Dingess/Hartman v. Nicholson.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.