The Board finds that there is no in-service injury or disease manifesting numbness in the legs, and thus service connection for this condition cannot be granted. The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to VA medical treatment is also denied as the evidence does not support a finding that the delay in diagnosis caused additional disability.
The deciding factor: The Board determined there was no chronicity of numbness in the legs during service, and thus service connection cannot be granted. The examiner's opinion did not find that the delay in diagnosing ependymoma caused additional disability.
- Claimed conditions
- numbness in the legs, ependymoma of the thoracic spine
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 3, 2008
- Citation
- 0800171
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0800171.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his claims for all issues related to service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed disabilities were not related to his military service, including exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of the appellant's claimed conditions, such as spine disorder, neurological impairment, heart disease, Graves' disease, headaches, dizziness, and numbness in the legs. The appellant is also scheduled for a psychiatric examination to address any PTSD or depression.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board is remanding the case for a medical opinion to determine if any of the Veteran's claimed disabilities are related to his period of active service, including exposure to herbicides. The RO must also ensure that all relevant records have been obtained and provide the appellant with proper notice.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.