The veteran's service medical records do not show a chronic foot condition during his active military service. Post-service treatment records also fail to document any current diagnosis of a bilateral foot condition. Therefore, the Board finds that service connection for a bilateral foot condition is not warranted.
The deciding factor: There is no competent medical evidence of a currently diagnosed bilateral foot condition in service or post-service.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Foot Condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2008
- Citation
- 0803997
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0803997.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of adequate medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's pre-existing pes planus was aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for COPD and bilateral foot condition due to a lack of medical opinions regarding the onset and relationship to service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for various conditions, including right and left knee limitations of flexion, bilateral foot condition, skin condition, and PTSD. The Veteran's claims were not granted as her conditions did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and an earlier effective date, finding that there was no evidence of current conditions or in-service aggravation to support these claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.