The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for service connection for low white blood cell count/leukopenia and an initial, compensable rating for fungal infection of the feet and nails due to potential exposure to Agent Orange during his military service. The VA is instructed to obtain all relevant medical records, provide the veteran with appropriate notice, and schedule him for examinations to determine if these conditions are related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional development was needed as there were conflicting opinions regarding whether the veteran's leukopenia could be linked to Agent Orange exposure. The VA is instructed to obtain all relevant medical records and provide the veteran with appropriate notice before scheduling him for examinations to determine if these conditions are related to his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- low white blood cell count/leukopenia
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2008
- Citation
- 0804005
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0804005.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for low white blood cell count/leukopenia and an initial compensable rating for fungal infection of the feet and nails, finding that there was no medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service or presumed herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Whole decision: Granted
Service connection for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is granted. The appeal as to the issue of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.