The veteran is seeking service connection for frostbite of both feet. The Board has determined that further development, including a medical examination, is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any current foot disabilities and whether they are related to active duty.
The deciding factor: Further evidence is required to establish the current nature and etiology of any currently present foot disorders and their relationship to the veteran's military service.
- Claimed conditions
- frostbite of both feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 15, 2008
- Citation
- 0805439
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0805439.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the Veteran's failure to appear for a scheduled videoconference hearing, and it is now requested again.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for sebaceous cysts, frostbite of both feet, and tendonitis of the legs as secondary to frostbite of the feet are all denied. The Board found no current disabilities associated with these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining service treatment records and private medical records to determine if the Veteran's current conditions are related to his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for frostbite of both hands, frostbite of both feet, and a right arm disorder secondary to a dog bite. The evidence did not support these claims as there was no current diagnosis related to the claimed conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.