The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected eye disabilities do not warrant a higher initial evaluation, as they do not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 30 percent under the applicable VA Rating Schedule.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence does not show anatomical loss of one eye or visual acuity of 20/50 or worse in both eyes to warrant a higher initial evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- shell fragment wound, right eye, loss of vision, left eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 3, 2008
- Citation
- 0807263
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0807263.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for financial assistance in the purchase of an automobile or other conveyance and/or adaptive equipment due to lack of loss or permanent loss of use of hands or feet, ankylosis of knees or hips, or vision impairment.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for left eye pseudophakia from cataract, loss of vision in the left eye, and gynecomastia, secondary to androgen deficiency. The reasons given were that there was no evidence linking these conditions to service or any exposure to radiation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks service connection for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II with hypertension. The case is being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding whether CRAO is caused or aggravated by the service-connected hypertension.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development and examination, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's conditions are related to his in-service exposure to ionizing radiation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.