The veteran's service-connected post-radical prostatectomy with stress incontinence was rated at 30 percent from April 27, 2005 to May 31, 2006 and at 60 percent from May 31, 2006 to August 31, 2006. The claim for a higher rating beyond this point was denied.
The deciding factor: The veteran's service-connected post-radical prostatectomy with stress incontinence did not meet the criteria for an increased rating beyond the assigned initial ratings of 30 percent and 60 percent, respectively.
- Claimed conditions
- stress incontinence
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 7, 2008
- Citation
- 0807889
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0807889.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for service connection for stress incontinence as secondary to her service-connected low back disability should be remanded due to a duty to assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for a compensable evaluation of stress incontinence and bilateral hearing loss to schedule additional VA examinations.
- Partly granted
The Board denied increased ratings for various conditions but granted a 70 percent rating for PTSD prior to November 27, 2023.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeals for service connection for stress incontinence, vaginitis, bilateral plantar fasciitis, lumbosacral strain with mild levoscoliosis, anxiety disorder with TBI, right knee patellofemoral pain syndrome with patellar dislocation, and bilateral hearing loss. The claims for increased ratings were also dismissed. The Board remanded several other claims for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.