The veteran's service-connected meatotomy for urethral stenosis with history of infections does not require the wearing of absorbent materials, and thus a compensable rating is not warranted.,The veteran's left testicle residuals cyst removal do not produce urinary tract infections requiring long-term drug therapy, 1-2 hospitalizations per year and/or intermittent intensive management. Therefore, a compensable rating is not warranted.,The veteran's pressure sore of the sacrum does not include a superficial scar which is unstable or painful on objective examination, nor does it produce limitations of function of any part. Thus, a compensable rating is not warranted.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations did not find evidence of urinary tract infections and no residual side effects from the meatotomy, preventing a higher rating based on voiding dysfunction or obstructed voiding criteria.,The veteran's left testicle residuals cyst removal do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating as there are no long-term drug therapy, 1-2 hospitalizations per year, and/or intermittent intensive management required due to urinary tract infections.,There is no evidence of unstable or painful scars on the sacrum pressure sore residuals, nor any limitations of function related to the disability.
- Claimed conditions
- Meatotomy for urethral stenosis with history of infections, Left testicle residuals cyst removal, Pressure sore of the sacrum
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 20, 2008
- Citation
- 0809329
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0809329.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.