The Board denied new and material evidence to reopen the claim for compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for loss of vision in the right eye.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show that the veteran's loss of vision was due to carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or an event which was not reasonably foreseeable by VA medical personnel.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of vision in the right eye
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 28, 2008
- Citation
- 0810303
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,293 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0810303.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's residuals of pituitary adenoma, post-resection, including loss of vision in the right eye, central hypogonadism, BPH, erectile dysfunction and central adrenal insufficiency, finding that his condition is at least as likely as not related to active-duty service due to exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty-to-assist error, and will consider any new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board has dismissed all service connection claims due to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for connective tissue disease, loss of vision in the right eye, lupus erythematosus, peripheral neuropathy, and COPD due to missing medical evidence and inadequate opinions regarding service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.