The Board remands the issue of service connection for memory loss as due to undiagnosed illness for further development and consideration.
The deciding factor: There is some contradictory medical evidence in the file regarding whether the veteran currently has a memory loss, necessitating additional development before a decision can be made.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of memory
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 4, 2008
- Citation
- 0811308
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,977 · Granted: 27% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0811308.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the veteran's appeal for service connection for various conditions due to a failure to file a timely notice of disagreement with an AOJ decision from January 2019.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's Parkinson's disease and related disabilities are service-connected. The Board granted the appeal for both issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for service connection for fatigue, PTSD, thyroid disorder, loss of memory, and headache disorder. The Board found that the VA did not provide necessary examinations and notifications.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding the VA examiner's opinion on the Veteran's claimed condition of memory loss and lack of concentration. The Veteran is requested to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation by an appropriate clinician to address his symptoms under both direct service connection theory and presumptive service connection for Gulf War syndrome.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.