The Board denied service connection for aortic insufficiency, finding no medical evidence linking the condition to service or any service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: There was no competent evidence showing that the veteran's aortic insufficiency was caused by his service or any of his service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- aortic insufficiency
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 15, 2008
- Citation
- 0812527
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The June 1985 rating decision denying service connection for aortic insufficiency should be reversed due to clear and unmistakable error (CUE), as the RO's determination that there was no indication of aortic insufficiency in service was factually erroneous. The outcome would have been manifestly different had this error not been made.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.