The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for aphasia, to include as secondary to service-connected residuals of a birdshot wound of the left scapula area, for further development.
The deciding factor: Further VA duty to assist is required due to the need for a neurological examination and review of outstanding medical records.
- Claimed conditions
- aphasia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 17, 2008
- Citation
- 0812762
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,548 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0812762.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy and mitral stenosis with annular thickening are granted effective June 30, 2013. The earlier effective dates for the neck disability and increased evaluations for upper extremity radiculopathy are also granted.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for aphasia was dismissed because the request for Board review was concurrent with a supplemental claim seeking review of the same denial.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The claim for increased ratings and higher level of SMC has been dismissed as the appellant's expenses related to the Veteran's last sickness and burial have been fully reimbursed.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection of aphasia and dysarthria as they have been fully granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.