The veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for service-connected osteopenia was denied as the evidence did not support a finding of a loss of range of motion or other symptoms that would warrant a compensable rating.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no evidence of painful motion, tenderness, spasms, arthritis, or any other symptomatology that would justify a compensable rating under the applicable criteria.
- Claimed conditions
- osteopenia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2008
- Citation
- 0813808
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 180 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0813808.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the Veteran's service connection claim for spina bifida occulta with degenerative arthritis and osteopenia is remanded due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the nature of his pre-existing condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the AOJ made a duty to assist error by failing to obtain an opinion on whether the Veteran's lumbosacral strain with osteopenia and spondylosis is due to or aggravated by his service-connected feet disabilities. The claim is being remanded for this purpose.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for osteopenia, secondary to the Veteran's service-connected prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the case to ensure that the duty to assist was satisfied with regard to obtaining VA and private records relevant to the claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.