The veteran's sacroiliac strain was rated at 10 percent prior to May 23, 2007, and increased to 20 percent from that date. The decision did not grant service connection for a left leg condition.
The deciding factor: The increase in rating was based on the veteran's demonstrated pain and reduced range of motion after May 23, 2007, which were not present prior to that date.
- Claimed conditions
- sacroiliac strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- May 7, 2008
- Citation
- 0815080
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,421 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0815080.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded two issues: increased ratings for lumbosacral strain and sacroiliac strain, as well as an increased rating for plantar fasciitis of the right foot. The decision does not address service connection theory or exposure basis.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for the service-connected sacroiliac strain has been dismissed because the Veteran withdrew his appeal in October 2021.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has expanded the Veteran's claim to include sacroiliac strain, spondylolisthesis of the fifth lumbar vertebra, osteoarthritis, and degenerative changes with radiculopathy. The case is being remanded for a new VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of these conditions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for bipolar effective disorder was denied as there is no factually ascertainable increase in disability during the one-year period prior to her May 22, 2014 contact.,The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for benign tumor of the right occipital area with left homonymous upper quadrantanopsia was denied as there is no factually ascertainable increase in disability during the one-year period prior to her May 22, 2014 contact.,The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for sacroiliac strain was denied as there is no factually ascertainable increase in disability during the one-year period prior to her May 22, 2014 contact.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.