The veteran's claim for VA disability compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability, left facial paralysis, due to a left total parotidectomy by VA in June 1994 was granted because the left facial paralysis was not reasonably foreseeable and was caused by VA surgical treatment.
The deciding factor: The permanent left facial nerve paralysis was not considered a reasonably foreseeable event of the surgery and was not due to fault on part of VA, thus meeting the criteria for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Claimed conditions
- left facial paralysis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 14, 2008
- Citation
- 0815738
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 734 · Granted: 9% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0815738.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current residuals of left jaw surgery are service-connected, as his pre-existing condition was aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to procedural issues, including the need for a hearing before another Veterans Law Judge at his local regional office.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The veteran has withdrawn his appeals for increased ratings on multiple service-connected conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia, left facial paralysis, cervical spine disability, dizziness and loss of balance, and loss of sense of taste.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability resulting from a May 2000 VA surgery, but the RO needs to obtain and review all relevant medical records and schedule an examination to determine if there is any additional disability due to the VA surgery.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.