The appeal is remanded for additional development, including a local personal hearing and VA examinations.
The deciding factor: Remand required due to the veteran's request for a local hearing and new evidence submitted by the veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- left subclavian shoulder/arm disorder, cardiac arrest secondary to left subclavian shoulder/arm disorder, hernia secondary to left subclavian shoulder/arm disorder, paralyzed right hemi diaphragm secondary to left subclavian shoulder/arm disorder, vagus nerve disorder with left vocal cord palsy secondary to left subclavian shoulder/arm disorder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 16, 2008
- Citation
- 0816261
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,613 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0816261.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining a 1989 angiogram and another opinion regarding his left subclavian shoulder/arm disorder. The issues of secondary service connection will also be addressed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inconsistencies in the November 2009 VA examiner's opinion and the need to obtain SSA records.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's headaches are at least as likely as not caused by his service-connected traumatic brain injury, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.