Remanded (sent back)
The case is remanded to the Veterans Benefits Administration for issuance of a Supplemental Statement of the Case addressing whether the debt was created by fraud, misrepresentation, or bad faith and whether collection would be against equity and good conscience.
The deciding factor: The SOC did not address two critical aspects of the claim as required by law, necessitating remand for additional development.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 20, 2008
- Citation
- 0816634
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.