The veteran's claim for service connection for testicular atrophy was not established until December 23, 2005, and thus the earliest effective date is that date.
The deciding factor: The earliest document in the claims file that may be accepted as a claim for service connection for testicular atrophy is dated December 23, 2005, which is also the earliest effective date allowed by law.
- Claimed conditions
- testicular atrophy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 22, 2008
- Citation
- 0816874
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,582 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0816874.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date for service connection for testicular atrophy and special monthly compensation, as well as higher initial ratings for PTSD and TDIU prior to September 16, 2008.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of left varicocele surgery and atrophy of the testis due to inadequate medical opinions and the need to obtain additional treatment records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a genitourinary disability, other than service-connected circumcision with erectile dysfunction and service-connected penile rash. The appeal is remanded due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the cause of the Veteran's current conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for testicular atrophy, urinary incontinence, right shoulder disability, left shoulder disability, and erectile dysfunction (ED) due to conflicting medical evidence regarding their onset and progression.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.