The Board denied the claim of service connection for bilateral ankle osteoarthritis and denied an increase rating for prostatitis. The veteran's claim was not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence.
The deciding factor: New and material evidence was not presented to reopen the claim of service connection for bilateral ankle osteoarthritis, as the additional evidence did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral ankle osteoarthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 5, 2008
- Citation
- 0818488
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0818488.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for hypertension and tinnitus, but denied service connection for a left wrist condition, chronic fatigue syndrome, dry mouth, and a skin condition. Several claims were remanded for further development.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for multiple musculoskeletal disabilities, including cervical spine degenerative disc disease and bilateral joint osteoarthritis, based on in-service exposure to PCBs.
- Denied
The Veteran's service connection claims for sleep apnea, left and right ankle osteoarthritis, and bilateral plantar fasciitis with right foot pes planus were denied. The Veteran was granted a 30 percent disability rating for his bilateral plantar fasciitis with right foot pes planus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for right and left ankle conditions due to a failure to comply with instructions in the Joint Motion for Partial Remand (JMR). The Veteran's claim must be remanded to obtain an addendum opinion that complies with the December 2017 remand directives, including considering all lay assertions. A new VA examination is also required to determine the nature and etiology of his bilateral ankle conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.