The Board denied service connection for a chronic urinary disorder, sexual impotence, and psychiatric disability. The veteran's claims were based on direct service connection rather than secondary or presumptive service connection.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence of a chronic urinary disorder related to military service, and the diagnoses of sexual impotence and psychiatric disability were not shown to be directly related to service.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic urinary disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 17, 2008
- Citation
- 0819857
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0819857.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied as his chronic urological disorder is not considered to be a result of VA surgical treatment, hospital care, or medical treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development and review of new evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for a videoconference hearing. The issues are related to reopening claims of service connection and seeking service connection for various conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.