The veteran seeks service connection for mitochondrial myopathy, which he claims pre-existed his service and was aggravated by it. The Board has ordered a remand to determine the etiology of the condition.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether the veteran's current muscular disability had its onset in service or if any increase in severity during service was due to natural progression of the disease.
- Claimed conditions
- mitochondrial myopathy
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 20, 2008
- Citation
- 0820418
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0820418.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied a separate rating for ocular symptomatology as part of the rhabdomyolysis rating assignments, finding that the Veteran's eye disorders are not caused or aggravated by his service-connected rhabdomyolysis.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected mitochondrial myopathy and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities result in actual loss of use of the lower extremities, meeting the criteria for financial assistance in purchasing an automobile or other conveyance.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for mitochondrial myopathy, a rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, type II, and TDIU prior to September 4, 2014. The claims are being returned for additional development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting information regarding the Veteran's service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to use his feet. The VA is instructed to schedule an examination to clarify these issues.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.