The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his post-traumatic seizure disorder is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The case requires further development as there are gaps in the record regarding treatment and recent evaluations.
- Claimed conditions
- post-traumatic seizure disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 30, 2008
- Citation
- 0821345
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0821345.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for special home adaptation grant due to his blindness in both eyes or loss of use of both hands.
- Granted
The veteran's claim for additional vocational rehabilitation benefits under Chapter 31, United States Code is granted as he has been found to be rehabilitated and the occupation in which he previously completed training is deemed unsuitable due to his abilities and employment handicap.
- Denied
The Board finds that the veteran's head injury and resulting disabilities were not incurred in the line of duty due to his own excessive alcohol consumption. As such, VA compensation benefits for these conditions are denied.
- Denied
The veteran's application for an annual clothing allowance was denied because the evidence did not demonstrate that his service-connected disabilities caused him to wear or use a prosthetic or orthopedic appliance which tended to wear out his clothing, or that he used medication due to a service-connected skin disorder resulting in irreparable damage to his outer garments.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.