The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate notice provided to the veteran regarding new and material evidence for his claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including schizophrenia.
The deciding factor: The Court found that the Board's analysis was not in error but erred in finding that VA's duty to notify under 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) had been satisfied due to misleading notices and failure to provide the correct version of 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(a).
- Claimed conditions
- acquired psychiatric disorder, to include schizophrenia
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2008
- Citation
- 0823832
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0823832.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a bilateral knee condition and an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include schizophrenia, due to insufficient medical evidence on file.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed because he died during the pendency of his appeal, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The appeal is being remanded due to the Veteran's request for a video conference hearing. The case will be returned to the AOJ after scheduling the hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's request for a Board hearing via videoconference was granted, and the case is now remanded to schedule an appropriate hearing in Syracuse, New York or another location closer to his residence than Buffalo, New York.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.