The Board has ordered additional development to obtain medical records and a medical opinion regarding the cause of the veteran's death, including potential service connection for amyloidosis. The case is being remanded due to incomplete development.
The deciding factor: Development was not completed as requested in previous remands.
- Claimed conditions
- Amyloidosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 25, 2008
- Citation
- 0825060
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0825060.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for the cause of his death, finding that there was no evidence of radiation exposure or participation in a radiation-risk activity during his active service. The Board also found that the Veteran's conditions did not have a causal connection to his military service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by his underlying conditions of multiple myeloma and amyloidosis, which are at least in equipoise with exposure to benzene during service. The claim for service connection for cause of death is granted.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and the Board finds no evidence to support claims for radiation or herbicide agent exposure. The Board also found insufficient evidence linking the Veteran's amyloidosis and subsequent congestive heart failure and restrictive cardiomyopathy to his in-service asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete VA examination and a need for additional opinions regarding the cause of the Veteran's death, specifically whether it is related to in-service asbestos exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.