The veteran's appeal is remanded for further development of his service-connected left hand disability, including a review of medical records and examinations to determine the severity of his symptoms and whether he should be evaluated separately for a compensable evaluation for a scar.
The deciding factor: Further factual development of the medical evidence is required to properly assess the veteran's current level of disability due to his service-connected left hand injury.
- Claimed conditions
- lacerated left hand, damage to cutaneous nerves, decreased grip strength
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 29, 2008
- Citation
- 0825229
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0825229.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's increased rating claim for his right upper extremity disability was denied as the evidence did not show that his condition warranted a higher rating. The TDIU claim was also denied due to insufficient evidence showing he is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain outstanding private treatment records and to schedule a VA examination. The increased rating claim for residuals of a laceration of the right ring and middle fingers with decreased extension and with ulnar nerve damage, loss of sensation, and decreased grip strength of the right upper extremity will be adjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.