The veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development, including a new examination and consideration of his claim based on CUE in an earlier rating decision.
The deciding factor: Further development is needed as the case involves issues related to increased disability ratings and effective dates, which require clarification through additional evidence and possibly reconsideration of prior decisions.
- Claimed conditions
- left scapula injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 11, 2008
- Citation
- 0826970
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0826970.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for left scapula injury and left rotator cuff disability, finding that these conditions are related to the Veteran's active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's current left shoulder disability, including rotator cuff and scapula, is related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection of left shoulder scapula and rotator cuff injuries due to additional development being needed. The issues are related to whether these conditions are related to service, particularly given the Veteran's history of clavicle fracture.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's somnambulism and left scapula injury were not incurred in or aggravated by active military service, as there was no clear evidence of an increase in severity beyond the natural progression during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.