The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete medical records and requests for additional information.
The deciding factor: Incomplete medical records prevent a determination on service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- mental disabilities, physical disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 13, 2008
- Citation
- 0827325
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0827325.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and physical disabilities prevented him from securing or maintaining substantially gainful employment prior to January 9, 2017. The Board granted a TDIU for this period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance, special monthly compensation at the housebound rate, and TDIU due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's mental disabilities. The VA is instructed to obtain additional medical opinions and consider extraschedular consideration if warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including mental health conditions, back pain, and nerve damage in his legs. The AOJ is instructed to consider all evidence received since the last Supplemental Statement of the Case.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied DIC benefits based on the Appellant's claim of being a helpless child due to his inability to self-support prior to age 18, finding that there was no evidence showing he was permanently incapable of self-support by reason of any condition before reaching 18 years old.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.