The veteran seeks reimbursement for unauthorized purchases of medications on April 1 and April 14, 2005. The VAMC has held that the circumstances surrounding the veteran's purchase did not constitute an emergent situation, and that VA facilities were feasibly available. The case is being REMANDED to the VAMC.
The deciding factor: The veteran's requirement for the medications at issue was in non-emergent circumstances so a delay of 10-14 days would have been feasible due to health concerns.
- Claimed conditions
- Hypertensive Vascular Disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 22, 2008
- Citation
- 0828626
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0828626.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and hypertensive vascular disease, as well as increased ratings for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in both upper and lower extremities due to inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Veteran's hypertensive vascular disease was rated at 20 percent, and the Board found that it did not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on diastolic pressure being predominantly 120 or more.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for his service-connected hypertensive vascular disease was denied as the evidence did not show that his systolic or diastolic pressure predominantly met the criteria for a higher rating.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are remanded due to the need for additional medical evidence, including private treatment records from Dr. M, and a VA examination considering Gulf War exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.