The Board found that the veteran's left knee disability, characterized by chondromalacia patellae, did not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher rating in excess of 10 percent. The evidence showed no ankylosis, moderate recurrent subluxation or lateral instability, cartilage dislocation, limitation of flexion to 30 degrees, or limitation of extension to 15 degrees. Therefore, the veteran's initial 10 percent rating for chondromalacia patellae was maintained.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show ankylosis, moderate recurrent subluxation or lateral instability, cartilage dislocation, limitation of flexion to 30 degrees, or limitation of extension to 15 degrees. The veteran's symptoms were considered in the context of normal anatomical range and functional limitations due to pain.
- Claimed conditions
- chondromalacia patellae
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- August 25, 2008
- Citation
- 0828831
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0828831.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for evaluations in excess of 10 percent for both left and right knee disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for left and right knee disabilities, finding that the evidence did not support a link between current knee conditions and service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of CUE in the May 1994 rating decision that awarded service connection for chondromalacia patellae of both knees and assigned a single 10 percent rating, finding no clear and unmistakable error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded three issues related to increased ratings for various knee and cervical spine conditions due to the submission of new evidence since the last Statement of the Case.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.