The Board has granted service connection for the veteran's residuals of a pulmonary embolism, finding that it was proximately due to his left knee surgery.
The deciding factor: The most recent opinion by Dr. T.W. indicated that the veteran's pulmonary embolism was, at least in part, proximately due to the preceding surgical procedure involving his service-connected left knee disability.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a pulmonary embolism
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 10, 2008
- Citation
- 0830629
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0830629.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals on all the issues, including service connection for heart disorder and prostate disorder, as well as evaluations for various injuries and conditions. As a result, these appeals are dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The case is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to determine the current level of impairment due to residuals of a pulmonary embolism.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to VA carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA in furnishing reasonable care during his June and July 2000 treatment.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of exposure to herbicides and no link between the condition and service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.