The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for specially adapted housing due to anatomical loss or use of limbs, nor does he have blindness in both eyes with only light perception and one lower extremity loss.
The deciding factor: The veteran's service-connected conditions do not result in anatomical loss or use of limbs that would preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair, nor does he meet the criteria for blindness in both eyes with only light perception and one lower extremity loss.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of shell fragment wound with loss of part of skull, chronic brain syndrome with brain trauma and neurotic reaction, scar, residuals of shell fragment wound to right leg and foot, scar, residuals of shell fragment wound to left side of face, scar, residuals of shell fragment wound to right forearm and hand, scar, residuals of shell fragment wound to right thigh, scar, residuals of shell fragment wound to left thigh, scar, residuals of shell fragment wound to left leg and foot, malaria
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 11, 2008
- Citation
- 0830748
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0830748.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient detail in a previous VA medical opinion regarding whether malaria or scarlet fever during service contributed to the Veteran's death. The case must be returned for further evaluation.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating for malaria was dismissed because the November 17, 2025 request for Board review came before the September 16, 2025 higher-level review of the same issue had been completed.
- Dismissed
The appeal has been dismissed due to the death of the Appellant, and no decision can be made on the underlying claims.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to duty-to-assist errors and additional examinations are required. The AOJ will also request clarification from the Veteran regarding his claim for malaria.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.