The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim for service connection for residuals of a head wound. However, upon review of all submitted evidence, including additional service medical records and statements from the veteran, the Board finds that there is no competent medical evidence showing any current residuals of a head injury related to military service.
The deciding factor: The additional service medical records do not provide clear evidence of a head wound in service or post-service treatment for such an injury. The November 1970 VA examination report, which was the most recent post-service medical record provided by the veteran, did not indicate any current residuals of a head injury.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a head wound
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 12, 2008
- Citation
- 0831088
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0831088.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations, service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disability are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and medical opinions.
- Denied
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the veteran's claims for service connection for hearing loss, scarring of the left ear, headaches, and residuals of a head wound. The evidence received is considered duplicative or insufficient to establish a nexus between these conditions and service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.