The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for leukemia, including as secondary to herbicide exposure. The evidence does not support a finding that the veteran has CLL and his CML is not presumed due to Agent Orange exposure.
The deciding factor: There was no in-service diagnosis of leukemia or any other blood-related disorder, and the VA physician's opinion regarding causation by herbicide exposure is speculative.
- Claimed conditions
- CML, CLL
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 15, 2008
- Citation
- 0831498
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0831498.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death was attributed to respiratory failure, overwhelming sepsis, and hypotension. The Appellant seeks service connection for the cause of her husband's death, alleging that it was due to complications from a bone marrow transplant related to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). However, there is no evidence confirming CML or its development during service.
- Granted
The Board finds that the evidence is at least in relative equipoise as to whether the Veteran's fatal AML and CML were related to chemical exposures in service, specifically Agent Orange exposure. After resolving all doubt in favor of the appellant, the Board grants service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.