The veteran seeks compensation for left hemidiaphragm paralysis resulting from a coronary artery bypass graft procedure performed at a VA medical facility in May 2000. The case is remanded to determine the nature and etiology of the claimed condition, including whether it was caused by the surgical procedure.
The deciding factor: The claim involves determining if the veteran's left hemidiaphragm paralysis is causally related to the coronary artery bypass graft procedure performed at a VA medical facility in May 2000.
- Claimed conditions
- left hemidiaphragm paralysis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 7, 2008
- Citation
- 0834379
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0834379.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for phrenic nerve paralysis with related left hemidiaphragm paralysis and sleep apnea as secondary to service-connected cervical spine and shoulder disorders due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and a respiratory condition, to include left hemidiaphragm paralysis and a lung condition due to inadequate opinions in previous decisions. The Veteran contends his sleep apnea is related to his service-connected residuals of right peritonsillar abscess and right cervical lymph node excision, as well as his service-connected tinnitus.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for TDIU prior to February 26, 2011, finding that his service-connected disabilities did not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease of the bilateral lower extremities were denied as there is no medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.,For the left hemidiaphragm disability, the claim was denied under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 because it resulted from treatment provided at a non-VA facility.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.