The Board has remanded the case for further development due to conflicting certifications from the National Personnel Records Center regarding the appellant's husband's military service.
The deciding factor: The NPRC's certification of the appellant's husband's military service is in conflict with previous valid certifications, requiring further investigation and clarification.
- Claimed conditions
- World War II service
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 21, 2008
- Citation
- 0836055
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0836055.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to non-compliance with previous directives, and further clarification is needed regarding the Appellant's spouse's service in World War II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional evidentiary development regarding the appellant's deceased spouse's World War II service and its impact on her application for VA death benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to concerns about verifying military service and determining whether an inquiry should have been forwarded to the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Human Resources Command.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further action due to a need to verify the appellant's husband's service in World War II and contact the appropriate service department.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.