The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a stomach condition/colitis or bilateral leg arthritis, and there is no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and his service-connected cervical spine disability. Therefore, secondary service connection for both conditions is denied.
The deciding factor: There is no competent medical evidence showing a link between the veteran's service-connected cervical spine disability and either stomach condition/colitis or bilateral leg arthritis.
- Claimed conditions
- stomach condition/colitis, bilateral leg arthritis
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2008
- Citation
- 0836760
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0836760.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for bilateral leg and hip arthritis, as well as a TDIU claim, due to inadequate medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied a higher rating for pes planus and remanded the issues of service connection for bilateral leg arthritis, bilateral hip arthritis, and TDIU.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for ulcers and remanded the claims of bilateral leg arthritis and peripheral vascular disease due to lack of current diagnoses. The cases are being returned to VA for further development.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on the merits of multiple claimed conditions was denied in a December 2015 rating decision. The Veteran did not file a timely Notice of Disagreement (NOD) within one year after receiving notice of this decision, and thus his appeal is dismissed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.