Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that the veteran's service in Korea did not qualify for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure, and thus denied his claim. The case is being remanded to comply with VA procedures regarding possible herbicide exposure during service.

The deciding factor: The veteran served in Korea but not in Vietnam where Agent Orange exposure would have qualified for presumptive service connection under VA regulations.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 28, 2008
Citation
0836997

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0836997.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.