The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of service connection for frostbite residuals of the feet, but denied the claim on the merits as there is no evidence that he incurred such a condition during his active military service.
The deciding factor: There is no medical evidence showing that the veteran experienced frostbite during his period of active duty in Korea and no current diagnosis of frostbite residuals has been established.
- Claimed conditions
- frostbite residuals of the feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 28, 2008
- Citation
- 0837030
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0837030.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to inadequate examinations and medical opinions. The issues include left knee condition, right knee condition, frostbite residuals of the feet, and bilateral shin splints.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims to reopen his service connection for frostbite residuals of the hands and feet, as well as his bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and bilateral shoulder disabilities. The claim for service connection for bilateral tinnitus is denied due to lack of prior communication indicating intent to file a claim.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for frostbite residuals of the feet and a back disorder, finding that these conditions are related to in-service injuries. The veteran's current foot disorders are considered at least as likely as not due to cold injury sustained during service, while his back disorder is found to be unrelated to service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection of frostbite residuals of the feet, finding that no new and material evidence had been presented.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.