Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The veteran's claim for service connection for dizziness was denied.,Service connection for a skin disorder of the back, claimed as athletes foot, was denied.,Service connection for hemorrhoids was denied.,Service connection for bilateral pes planus was denied.,Service connection for a low back disorder other than arthritis (claimed as a muscle injury) was denied.,Service connection for a left foot disorder (claimed as numbness and a cold sensation) was denied.

The deciding factor: The evidence did not show that the veteran's dizziness is causally or etiologically related to his military service.,There is no evidence showing that the veteran currently has a skin disorder of the back, including as due to Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam.,Service connection for hemorrhoids was denied because there is no competent medical evidence showing they are related to any aggravation during service or otherwise etiologically related to his military service.,The veteran's pes planus preexisted his entrance into active service and the evidence did not show that it was aggravated by service, thus denying service connection for bilateral pes planus.,There is no competent medical evidence showing a low back disorder other than arthritis is causally or etiologically related to his military service or to a service-connected disorder.,Service connection for a left foot disorder (claimed as numbness and a cold sensation) was denied because there is no competent medical evidence showing it is causally or etiologically related to his military service or to a service-connected disorder.

Claimed conditions
dizziness, skin disorder of the back (claimed as athletes foot), hemorrhoids, bilateral pes planus, low back disorder other than arthritis (claimed as a muscle injury), left foot disorder (claimed as numbness and a cold sensation)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 30, 2008
Citation
0837435

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0837435.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.