The veteran's claim for specially adapted housing is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination and additional medical records.
The deciding factor: The veteran needs an evaluation to determine if he meets the criteria for specially adapted housing based on his service-connected disabilities or conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- loss or loss of use of both lower extremities, blindness in both eyes with only light perception
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 5, 2008
- Citation
- 0841901
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0841901.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board finds that the Veteran does not meet the criteria for specially adapted housing, special home adaptation, or SMC based on the need for aid and attendance due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for specially adapted housing is remanded due to his service-connected conditions and the need to file a secondary service connection claim if he wishes to pursue this benefit.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's blindness in both eyes, with only light perception, meets the criteria for an increased special monthly compensation rate at the 'm' level.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.