The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service medical records and a need for additional development, including obtaining VA examination results.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further investigation into the veteran's claims, particularly regarding the in-service circumcision and its potential impact on his current health conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- spinal disorder, leg disorder, residuals of a circumcision
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 15, 2008
- Citation
- 0843060
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0843060.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of service connection for various conditions and readjudication of the character of service due to new evidence.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The veteran's claims for service connection for several conditions were dismissed or denied. The veteran failed to appear for scheduled examinations, which led to the denial of increased ratings for lumbar strain and right ear hearing loss.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew their appeals regarding the issues of increased disability rating for migraines and service connection for bone, leg, and seizure disorders. As a result, these issues are dismissed.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a leg disorder, including peripheral vascular disease (PVD), finding that there is no evidence to support a link between his current condition and his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.