The veteran is seeking reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred at a private hospital. The Board has ordered the VA to obtain missing records and provide a medical opinion on the stability of the veteran's condition, which will determine if he was stable enough to transfer from the private facility to a VA facility.
The deciding factor: The decision requires obtaining missing treatment records and providing a medical opinion regarding the veteran's overall stability after his intracranial hemorrhage stabilized on December 26, 2006.
- Claimed conditions
- intracranial hemorrhage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 23, 2008
- Citation
- 0844356
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0844356.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new evidence received after a previous Supplemental Statement of the Case. The issues include the cause of death, intracranial hemorrhage, acquired psychiatric disorder (likely PTSD), diabetes mellitus, low back disorder, hypertension, and eye disorder.
- Granted
The Veteran's cause of death, intracranial hemorrhage with metastatic colon cancer as a contributing cause, is found to be service-connected.,Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 is denied due to the Veteran not meeting the criteria for total disability ratings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for stroke residuals and entitlement to a TDIU due to conflicting evidence regarding whether the Veteran's hypertension, presumed due to herbicide exposure, caused his stroke. The AOJ is instructed to investigate this issue further.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for intracranial hemorrhage, thrombosis, TIA, and cerebral infarction. The issue of service connection for obstructive hydrocephalus is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.