The Board has determined that additional development is required on the issues of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death and Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA). The RO should obtain medical records from Mount Sinai Hospital, obtain a VA physician's opinion regarding whether Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam caused or contributed to the veteran's death, and adjudicate the claims based on all available evidence.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional development is needed due to incomplete information about the cause of the veteran's death and potential service connection for Agent Orange exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- Liver disease
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 24, 2008
- Citation
- 0844503
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0844503.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a more detailed medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran requires personal care services, supervision or protection based on symptoms or residuals of neurological or other impairment or injury, and needs regular extensive instruction or supervision.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for liver disease, erectile dysfunction and BPH, and an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include anxiety and depression.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for liver disease and diabetic nephropathy (claimed as chronic kidney disease) due to a lack of evidence supporting the claims. The squamous cell carcinoma claim was remanded for further review.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, which was due to liver disease. The DIC claim under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 is dismissed as moot.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.