The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a muscle examination to determine the current nature and severity of the veteran's gunshot wound to the left foot.
The deciding factor: Further development is required due to insufficient information in the veteran's treatment records and the need to ascertain all current residuals of the gunshot wound to the left foot.
- Claimed conditions
- gunshot wound to the left foot
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 24, 2008
- Citation
- 0844607
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0844607.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's left foot gunshot wound residuals have been manifested by a painful scar, and he is entitled to an initial disability rating of 10 percent for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a sleep disorders examination.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's gunshot wound to the left foot and assigned a noncompensable rating, which is increased to 10 percent effective September 1, 2006.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to procedural issues related to a simultaneously contested claim for attorney fees. The Veteran's claims for higher ratings and earlier effective dates remain pending.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.