The appeal is remanded for additional development, including providing the appellant with proper VCAA notice and obtaining necessary evidence to determine if VA facilities were feasibly available during the relevant time period.
The deciding factor: The claim was denied due to a lack of information regarding when the appellant's condition stabilized and whether a VA facility was feasibly available. Additional documentation is required for a full review.
- Claimed conditions
- Stroke residuals
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 9, 2009
- Citation
- 0901021
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0901021.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and TDIU was denied as the AOJ did not consider it a supplemental claim, and the decisions were based on initial claims filed in February 2024.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him in need of regular aid and attendance, which is granted for special monthly compensation (SMC).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for diabetes mellitus type II, to include separate compensable ratings for diabetic retinopathy, hypertension, hypertensive retinopathy, atrial fibrillation, and stroke residuals.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings, eligibility for specially adaptive housing and a special home adaptation grant, and remanded several service connection claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.