The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a detached retina of the right eye is being remanded to obtain additional evidence.
The deciding factor: Records pertaining to the YAG laser procedure performed in 2003 are missing and need to be obtained before further adjudication can take place.
- Claimed conditions
- detached retina of the right eye
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 9, 2009
- Citation
- 0901022
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 609 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0901022.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for Parkinson's disease, a heart disability, and lymphoma with chemotherapy due to in-service exposure to an herbicide agent.,Service connection was also denied for aneurysm of the right-side heart. The Veteran did not have this condition during his lifetime.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's radiculopathy of the left lower extremity is rated at 10 percent, and his claim for service connection for detached retina of the right eye was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development due to the need for an etiological opinion regarding his detached retina and hearing loss, as well as issues related to his diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination and readjudication of his claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.