The appeal is being remanded to the RO for further development and readjudication of the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded due to a need for additional VCAA notice, medical evidence, and an opinion regarding the etiology of the factors that contributed to the veteran's death.
- Claimed conditions
- Prostate cancer, status post radical prostatectomy, Impotency
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 14, 2009
- Citation
- 0901459
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,350 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0901459.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal concerning the issues of service connection for bladder cancer and impotency is dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the discontinuance of SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ was in error due to legal and factual errors, and has restored SMC effective April 1, 1999.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that new and relevant evidence has been submitted to re-adjudicate the claims for service connection for bladder cancer and impotency secondary to bladder cancer. The claims are being remanded due to a lack of development regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicides at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, an acquired psychiatric condition (depression), erectile dysfunction secondary to prostate cancer status post radical prostatectomy, diabetes mellitus, Type II, and prostate cancer. The Board also found that new evidence was not sufficient to reopen his claim for a bilateral foot condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.